I’m impressed and glad to see a game developer taking a step such as this. It isn’t really necessary, but it does add a some flavor to the game in the way of shock value.

Very ballsy move (forgive the pun).

I wouldn’t agree that the game had enough “shock value” in it to call this move “gutsy” or at all “appropriate”. The entire game and gameplay felt like a very bland 2D experience, nothing really new was done or felt anywhere. At no point in time did I actually feel like “wow, this is how I pictured hell”… It felt more like, “wow, this is how a pictured God of War III” (over the top, but I’m sure you get my point). Adding a huge “wang” on Lucifer just seemed awkward and satirical. It doesn’t help when you reflect the way they talk about it in that video. It doesn’t even feel like it improved the look of Lucifer artistically… It simply looks like it was slapped on and the testosterone driven developers had a few good laughs while thinking, “I wonder what the media will say”. I think it almost pokes fun at the game and does NOTHING to enhance ANYTHING. Which goes just as well with the rest of the stuff they did, like the all too often, perfectly angled shots in the scenes with the nude Beatrice.

I don’t think what they did was wrong, but as the entire game lacked real quality, it seems like a failure and an absolutely wasted way of trying to force artistic driven nudity into a new type of media… If I could so boldly suggest that that is what it was for.

Really? Do the developers really wanna suck that nightmare cock of evil?